the Neurobiology of safety with Contemplative and Somatic Psychotherapy

Understanding Trauma and the Need for Safety

Trauma disrupts an individual's sense of safety, leading to heightened states of arousal, hypervigilance, and a pervasive sense of threat. The body's natural response to danger—the fight, flight, or freeze response—can become dysregulated, resulting in chronic stress and anxiety. To effectively treat trauma, it is crucial to create conditions that restore safety and allow the nervous system to return to a state of balance.

Contemplative Psychotherapy and Safety

Contemplative psychotherapy integrates mindfulness and contemplative practices with traditional therapeutic approaches. The focus is on cultivating present-moment awareness, compassion, and non-judgmental acceptance. Contemplative and mindfulness practices have been shown to promote neuroplasticity, the brain's ability to reorganize itself by forming new neural connections. This process involves the growth of new neurons and the strengthening of existing ones, particularly in brain areas associated with emotional regulation, such as the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. For trauma survivors, this reorganization helps develop new, healthier patterns of thinking and emotional regulation. By fostering present-moment awareness, mindfulness helps individuals feel safer by reducing the intrusion of traumatic memories and ruminative thoughts. The prefrontal cortex, which is involved in executive functions such as decision-making and impulse control, becomes more engaged, allowing for better regulation of emotional responses (Davidson & McEwen, 2012; Hölzel et al., 2011).

Compassion and Emotional Regulation

Compassion practices, such as loving-kindness meditation, activate brain areas associated with empathy and emotional regulation, like the insula and the anterior cingulate cortex. The insula is involved in processing bodily sensations and emotions, while the anterior cingulate cortex plays a role in decision-making and emotional self-regulation. These practices help individuals develop a kind and nurturing relationship with themselves, counteracting the harsh self-criticism and shame often associated with trauma. Neuroimaging studies have shown increased activation in these areas during compassion-based meditations, suggesting that regular practice can enhance the brain's capacity for empathy and self-soothing, thus promoting a sense of safety and emotional well-being (Lutz, Brefczynski-Lewis, Johnstone, & Davidson, 2008; Singer & Klimecki, 2014).

Non-judgmental Awareness

Developing non-judgmental awareness allows individuals to observe their thoughts and feelings without becoming overwhelmed. This acceptance fosters psychological flexibility and resilience, helping trauma survivors navigate their emotions more effectively and feel safer within their own minds. Non-judgmental awareness reduces the activity of the default mode network (DMN), a network of brain regions that is active during passive rest and mind-wandering, and often associated with self-referential thinking and rumination. By quieting the DMN, individuals can break free from the cycles of negative thought patterns that exacerbate anxiety and trauma-related symptoms (Brewer et al., 2011; Farb et al., 2007).

Somatic Psychotherapy and Safety

Somatic psychotherapy emphasizes the connection between mind and body, recognizing that trauma is stored in the body as well as the mind. This approach involves body awareness, movement, and other techniques to release physical tension and restore a sense of safety. Increasing awareness of bodily sensations, or interoception, helps individuals recognize and respond to their physical needs. Interoception involves the brain regions such as the insula and the somatosensory cortex, which process internal bodily states. This awareness can reduce the physical manifestations of trauma, such as muscle tension and chronic pain, and foster a sense of safety in the body. Enhanced interoceptive awareness allows trauma survivors to tune into their body’s signals and take appropriate actions to care for themselves, thereby restoring a sense of control and safety (Craig, 2002; Mehling et al., 2012).

Grounding Techniques and Autonomic Regulation

Grounding techniques help regulate the autonomic nervous system. The autonomic nervous system consists of the sympathetic (fight or flight) and parasympathetic (rest and digest) branches. Neurobiological research suggests that grounding techniques can activate the vagus nerve, which is a key player in the parasympathetic nervous system, thus reducing physiological arousal and enhancing a sense of calm and security (Porges, 2009; Schauer & Elbert, 2010).

Movement and Somatic Release

Gentle movement practices can facilitate the release of stored trauma in the body. These practices help individuals reconnect with their bodies, fostering a sense of control and safety. Movement therapies engage brain areas involved in motor control and sensory integration, such as the cerebellum and the somatosensory cortex, promoting the integration of traumatic memories and physical sensations. By allowing the body to move and release tension, individuals can process and let go of the physical remnants of trauma, thereby enhancing their overall sense of well-being and safety (van der Kolk, 2014; Mehling et al., 2011).

Polyvagal Theory and Safety

Polyvagal Theory, developed by Dr. Stephen Porges, provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the neurobiological basis of safety. The theory emphasizes the role of the vagus nerve in regulating the autonomic nervous system and fostering social connection and safety. The vagus nerve, the primary component of the parasympathetic nervous system, plays a crucial role in promoting safety and relaxation. Polyvagal Theory identifies three states of autonomic regulation: ventral vagal (safety and social engagement), sympathetic (fight or flight), and dorsal vagal (shutdown or freeze). Trauma can disrupt the balance of these states, leading to chronic stress and anxiety. The ventral vagal state, associated with feelings of safety and social connection, is crucial for trauma recovery. Activating the vagus nerve through practices like deep breathing and social engagement can help restore this balance and promote a sense of calm and security (Porges, 2007; Porges, 2011).

Social Engagement System

The ventral vagal state supports social engagement, helping individuals feel safe and connected. Brain areas involved in social engagement include the prefrontal cortex and the vagal complex. Practices that stimulate the vagus nerve, such as deep breathing, social bonding, and vocalization (singing or chanting), can enhance the sense of safety and promote healing. These activities activate the parasympathetic nervous system, reducing stress and fostering a sense of connection and support, which are vital for trauma survivors (Porges, 2009; Carter & Porges, 2013).

Neuroception

Polyvagal Theory introduces the concept of neuroception, the unconscious detection of safety or threat. Trauma can impair neuroception, making it difficult for individuals to accurately assess their environment. Neuroception involves brain areas such as the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex, which work together to detect and respond to safety cues. Therapeutic practices that enhance neuroception can help trauma survivors feel safer by improving their ability to detect and respond to cues of safety and danger. Enhancing neuroception allows individuals to better navigate their environments, reducing feelings of chronic threat and promoting a sense of safety and well-being (Porges, 2003; Porges & Dana, 2018).

Integrating Approaches for Comprehensive Trauma Treatment

Combining contemplative psychotherapy, somatic psychotherapy offers a holistic approach to trauma treatment, addressing both the psychological and physiological aspects of safety. This can be seen with mindful body awareness practice, compassion and social engagement practices, and grounding and neuroception practices.

Lastly, the most important part of healing is feeling safe with your therapist, research has shown that the therapeutic relationship is a large portion of success in healing no matter the modality practiced.

References

Brewer, J. A., Worhunsky, P. D., Gray, J. R., Tang, Y. Y., Weber, J., & Kober, H. (2011). Meditation experience is associated with differences in default mode network activity and connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(50), 20254-20259. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112029108

Carter, C. S., & Porges, S. W. (2013). The biochemistry of love: An oxytocin hypothesis. *EMBO Reports, 14*(1), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2012.191

Craig, A. D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. *Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3*(8), 655-666. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn894

Davidson, R. J., & McEwen, B. S. (2012). Social influences on neuroplasticity: Stress and interventions to promote well-being. *Nature Neuroscience, 15*(5), 689-695. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3093

Farb, N. A. S., Segal, Z. V., Mayberg, H., Bean, J., McKeon, D., Fatima, Z., & Anderson, A. K. (2007). Attending to the present: Mindfulness meditation reveals distinct neural modes of self-reference. *Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2*(4), 313-322. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsm030

Hölzel, B. K., Carmody, J., Vangel, M., Congleton, C., Yerramsetti, S. M., Gard, T., & Lazar, S. W. (2011). Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain gray matter density. *Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 191*(1), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.08.006

Lutz, A., Brefczynski-Lewis, J., Johnstone, T., & Davidson, R. J. (2008). Regulation of the neural circuitry of emotion by compassion meditation: Effects of meditative expertise. *PLoS ONE, 3*(3), e1897. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001897

Mehling, W. E., Price, C., Daubenmier, J. J., Acree, M., Bartmess, E., & Stewart, A. (2012). The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA). *PLoS ONE, 7*(11), e48230. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048230

Mehling, W. E., Wrubel, J., Daubenmier, J. J., Price, C. J., Kerr, C. E., Silow, T., & Stewart, A. L. (2011). Body awareness: A phenomenological inquiry into the common ground of mind-body therapies. *Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 6*(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-6-6

Porges, S. W. (2003). The polyvagal theory: Phylogenetic substrates of a social nervous system. *International Journal of Psychophysiology, 42*(2), 123-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(03)00156-2

Porges, S. W. (2007). The polyvagal perspective. *Biological Psychology, 74*(2), 116-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.06.009

Porges, S. W. (2009). The polyvagal theory: New insights into adaptive reactions of the autonomic nervous system. *Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 76*(Suppl 2), S86-S90. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.76.s2.17

Porges, S. W. (2011). The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and self-regulation. W. W. Norton & Company.

Porges, S. W., & Dana, D. (2018). Clinical applications of the polyvagal theory: The emergence of polyvagal-informed therapies. W. W. Norton & Company.

Schauer, M., & Elbert, T. (2010). Dissociation following traumatic stress. *Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 218*(2), 109-127. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409/a000018

Singer, T., & Klimecki, O. M. (2014). Empathy and compassion. *Current Biology, 24*(18), R875-R878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.054

Van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking.